Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Snow Plow On Dune Buggy







Pokemon Deluge Cheat Exp

Intervention bioethanol sit-in on February 10

We are here today to break a silence.

In a situation so delicate and dramatic as private as what the family is living Englaro, a respectful silence would be more appropriate attitude, and this is the attitude that until now we have followed for bioethanol. For a form of respect, needed now more than ever, we want to focus on the question of the rule of law and threatened to try to emphasize to rebut the arguments frequently put forward by the media, beyond the story of Eluana.

We therefore felt compelled to take the word following the events of recent days. We would like to hear

Englaro the family and the public that one voice and pounding coming from members of the ruling parties and the Vatican is not the only nor the most shared, denounce the arrogance of these positions, their rhetoric and smoke, positions often without analysis, a reflection of the confrontation, the difficulty of understanding the situation.
have been put in place a series of increasingly violent attacks on the rule of law until the fatal wound inflicted last Friday by the parties currently in government. Parties who have always disinterested ethical issues and that now they exploit a tragedy for the purposes of private power.

E 'was attacked the legitimacy of the Court of Cassation, the highest degree of Italian jurisdiction, challenging the principle of separation of powers. The Prime Minister has tried to bypass this trend first presented with a Decree overnight, and then attacked the President Napolitano, "threatened" instead of presenting a bill in record time, bypassing its stance. Decision which, if continued, will a law totally inadequate and unsatisfactory.

E 'was therefore deliberately opened an institutional battle between the highest offices of state after the President had suggested a comparison of large and shared on the subject of living wills and doubts on the constitutionality of Decree Law wrote overnight. A decree concerning an individual case and a matter so private, in front of which the State had a duty to stop, otherwise the infringement of the right to self-determination and the imposition of a choice but to take it only to the individual, following their religious beliefs or not.

So - in a escalation that seems to have really less and less to do with ethical issues so delicate - the Prime Minister attacked the Constitution, considering it insufficient to satisfy his desires, and has stated its willingness to revise as needed.

So today we are here because you called to defend the secular state, defense of constitutional rights, democratic order and the separation of powers.

Secondly, it is important to note that it has completely lost sight of the heart of ethical discourse, namely the reconciliation of the right to self-determination with the protection of people's lives and the issue of living wills, because of an attitude media more attentive to the spectacle of events to perform its primary function of information.

These days it seems that the primary purpose of the media is to reverse the position of the public, taking advantage of fears, emotional reactions caused by parallel force (if not totally contrived), and lack of knowledge on such specific topics using a rhetoric mischievous and far from the facts. However, when more than ever feels the urgent need for clear and accurate information so much on the medical and scientific overview on the legal and ethical issues and problems.

All this has brought no other result than the comparison of freezing and sweep away what little parliamentary debate already started.

Instead, what is important and necessary to recognize that this is the personal story is of value in terms of rights. How it has brought to light the need to fill a legislative vacuum careful regulation that seeks to respect the constitutional rights and provide tools for such complex decisions for households and for the hospital medical staff.

From this point of view, it is clear that the presence of a living will legally recognized and always editable makes any dispute as to the veracity of the testimony of a will expressed.

Any attempt to depose value of such an instrument for the expression of their will and then - through it - dismiss the value of individual autonomy, is intended to propose to chronicle many dramatic situations of this kind. We are faced with the proposal of a fictitious document that, far from being the continuation of the dialectical necessity in a worthy doctor-patient relationship in the event of unconsciousness, admission of impotence becomes synonymous with decision-making and medical paternalism, no longer acceptable. In its worst result this implies that it is impossible for the patient to refuse medical treatment of artificial nutrition and hydration. The other outrageous aspect

was the use of media to any arguments to suggest the question of murder and pain in our minds. The debate shows the backwardness in which we move from other countries. An example? Only in Italy will continue to use the topic of nutrition and hydration as medical treatments do not, abroad for years has been giving for granted that the acts being carried out only by qualified personnel, can only be described as 'doctors'.

We see the moves frequently used to arouse guilt in the conscience of those who argue the legality of the suspension of treatment. The argument

della'china slippery ', or the theory that allow the suspension of vital treatments the patient would lead to the abandonment of the weak and disabled

and pave the way for the abolition of all those patients who are in a PVS or in a state of unconsciousness. This prediction, however, appears to be totally erroneous since it does not take into account the fact, central, and essential that the necessary element is always the patient's wishes. If any medical action was linked to the individual will consent or dissent would avoid the allegations of abuse.


Another fear that is seeking to instill in all of us is that of the 'pain'. This usage or implied by terms such as 'dying of hunger and thirst,' which are linked to detailed descriptions about what happens day to day agency, or explicitly alluding to the possibility that the patient is suffering excruciating pain.

First of all is never to misuse of the absence of irreversible consciousness in the patient in PVS, since the damage to the cerebral cortex - in general confirmed by the results of autopsies performed on these patients. Moreover, although the description of what happens to a body deprived of nutrition and hydration, can take dramatic, one can not consider that the patient will not have perception of this process.

Placing the emphasis on finding weaknesses in the neurological field to cancel the existence of clinical certainty is intellectually wrong.


speak in these terms of level of consciousness that can connect to another topic that is often repeated that the 'miraculous awakenings', which rests on a confusion of terminology, sometimes intentional, between 'coma' and 'SVP'. In the first case one can speak of 'awakening' in the latter is internationally recognized as the irreversibility of the condition after one year of clinical observation (during which it is forbidden discontinue treatment).


We want to conclude by inviting not to be fooled by these manipulations and simplifications political-media and invited to reflect on the complexity of different issues at stake but require a power of awareness to avoid being enslaved by the opinions and wishes of others.


We as Beppino Englaro, we all deserve respect personal choices and values \u200b\u200bthat guide without expressing any opinion on the lives of others,


WISH THAT CLOSE IN OUR POLITICAL do likewise.




Sunday, March 1, 2009

Isabella Sopranio Cathouse




S. Parish Maria di Loreto

LENT 2009

Sunday, March 1: First Sunday of Lent
Thursday, March 5: Pilgrimage to Vicariale Virgin Odegitria (Cathedral of Bari)
Friday, March 6: 1st Fri of the month
16.30: Exhibition of SS.mo Sacramento
"18.00: Vespers and Eucharistic Benediction
" 18.30: S. Mass
"19.15: Lenten Liturgy
Saturday, March 7, at 17.15: Meeting of catechesis for parents of children catechism
Sunday, March 8: Second Sunday of Lent
Wednesday, March 11: Lectio divina interparochial Youth and Thurs. I am at the Trinity Parish SS.ma
Friday, March 13, at 19.15: Via Crucis animated by the children's catechism and their parents
Sunday, March 15: Third Sunday of Lent Retreat Diocesan
the engaged preparing for marriage preached by Archbishop F. Cacucci
Friday, March 20, at 19.15: Via Crucis Community
Saturday, March 21, 20.00: Musicol on S. Paul: "I need only you"
Sunday, March 22: Fourth Sunday of Lent
retreats for young at the Seminary of Bari
From March 23 to 27: Spiritual exercises for children and young people in care of the young town Look
Merc. 25 - Thurs. 26 - Fri March 27: Forty SS.me EUCHARISTIC
7,30: S. Mass
"8.00: Presentation of SS.mo Sacramento
" 18.00: Solemn Vespers with Benediction
preaching and Friday 27: Via Cross interparochial
Sunday, March 29: Fifth Sunday of Lent (Lent Charity)
Wednesday, April 1, at 19.45: Community Catechesis
Friday, April 3: 1st Friday of the month
17.00: Exhibition of SS.mo Sacramemto
"17.30: Confessions of the children's catechism
'18.30: Evening Prayer and Benediction
" 19.00: S Mass
"19.30:
community penance and individual confessions

Good Way to conversion and holiness to all Don Pasquale