-refresh Launch Commands Source

MARITAL AND PARENTAL RIGHTS OF BRAIN-INJURED

Of wedlock are born to husband and wife equal rights and duties (art.143c.c.), such as mutual obligation of loyalty, moral and material assistance, cooperation in the interest of the family and cohabitation.
However, in the case of Elena, her husband, after a short period of time, preferred to "abandon the field, which is fairly common in couples, especially young people. He
, without notice, taking advantage of the fact that the laws were absent, because the result of his daughter admitted to a rehabilitation institution, transferred his residence and that of the daughter of four years at the home of his mother, bringing what could subtract from marital home. From that moment he is completely uninterested in the fate of his wife and has hindered the relationship between affective and consolidated his maternal grandparents and grandchild. Not only that, he searched and found another partner with which it is often shown in public, even in the presence of the child, justifying this behavior with the expectation of an imminent "end" of his wife.
Even today I can not explain the reason for such behavior and cruelty with which it was put in place. The erase from memory the years spent with his wife, good relations with her in-laws have often argued that even in his work, can help him overcome the pain caused by state in which there is the wife? It would have been, however, more just "develop" the pain, and stand next to his wife and the in-laws, sharing sacrifices and suffering?
Above all, what right and what use to impose such conduct to his daughter? The only explanation I can find is in the grand and petty selfishness of man, who, far from nourishing feeling of love for his wife (maybe he never loved), he just used and then reduced the fate of a poor thing, no longer useful, the other was abandoned because he takes the load, but first, he was stripped of everything, including her daughter.
The obligations under the marriage? The marital
?
can be safely disregarded and trampled upon, because Elena can not claim them!
rights as a mother?
They are lost, as the "parental authority" under Article .317 cc is exercised exclusively by the father, who, even before the declaration of the ban, has already decided that she should never see his mother. This is in sharp contrast with the opinion expressed by the most authoritative psychologists and psychiatrists consider it necessary to "tell the children the truth, even if painful."
In fact, says psychiatrist Paul Crepet, that if you want to help her son, "not you must put the goal of making him suffer less, but make him understand the reality as it is, thinking that the child will develop in its own way. Therefore, it is important that children know where and how's mom and to see it for yourself. In this way you can take to prevent unhealthy behaviors that may help him to escape or who is her way of adapting to something that feels false. "
In a few simple words: it is harmful to the baby to hide the reality though difficult and painful, because this is not him strength and helps to address adequately the life.
So, the father exercising exclusive parental authority was wrong, why did he exercised without consultation with a qualified professional, illegally, before it was concluded the process for the Prohibition of the mother and it was open for the protection of the child and that the judge possessed forms of exercise and supervision under Article. 317bis cc. It is my opinion that the parent or guardian, normally balanced by their mother tongue should be "monitored" in the interests of the child, where is exercised unilaterally, in order to avoid forms of "morbid" and an erroneous operation.
conclude these notes have been informed by lived experiences personally and invite any readers to express their opinion on the following points, In my opinion, affect the generality of the brain-injured and their families:
· justify the conduct of the spouse healthy?
· judged it appropriate and useful to prevent access to children attending the brain-injured parent?
• What actions can have the brace to protect the dignity and rights of the brain?
• In particular, the guardian may apply on behalf of brain injury that has ruled the separation of fact?
• The brain-injured by the guardian may exercise some form of supervision on the exercise of parental authority under Article .317 encore?
thank all those who wish to participate in the discussion.

Lia Sophia Jewelry Party

THE RIGHT TO LIFE
am speaking in this debate by bringing all my doubts, all my uncertainties. Are unable to discuss whether it is legally correct behavior of the father of Eluana, or whether it is one of the judges who have voted for the suspension of each treatment Eluana, leading thus to certain death.
Provo, however, admiration for the courage and determination that shows the girl's father in fact, and this admiration increases when compared to its strength and security with my weakness and uncertainty.
In fact, I prefer to take with me my daughter Helen, two years in a vegetative state, assuming, with my wife, the burden of treat, feed, wash, etc. .. Every day we provide to their needs, without getting any sign of change in the knowledge that there is a semblance of a smile, a tear that make us hope for even the most minimal recovery.
Yet we continue and will continue to assist and cure it, because we love and why we do not have the courage to do without it. Perhaps the father of Eluana loves his daughter more than us because, seeing the physical suffering and uselessness of life lived in that way, than any feeling of love and decides to end it. E 'right? Actually corresponds to the will of the poor creature that perhaps incorporates, but is unable to speak? It is alleged that
Eluana would never want to live this way and that this effect was expressed some time ago. But the will may change with changing circumstances: to prefer death to any mutilation of the body can be strongly felt when their functions are perfect, but it may fail when you feel close to death and then it would be terrible not being able to express its different intention. The limit of the "living will" is just that: it could no longer represent the will of the subject when it should be performed.
Grande Therefore, it is the responsibility of the person who undertakes the task of interrupting each treatment to the sick, restoring, he said, the course of nature leads them to death.
THE LAWS OF NATURE: they are inspired by a basic principle: the weak must succumb to the strong. This principle, in modern times, was not accepted by mankind, except in some particular historical period (Nazism, fascism), on the contrary, natural laws have been violated thousands of times for the benefit of a human life longer, healthier and was legislated in the opposite direction in order to protect the weaker creatures by the arrogance of the fittest. Restore the laws natural now?! It 's a choice that, in this case, I would say is a fundamental "political", as was the case with "Welbi" between opposing tendencies: between what is in some way, and would like to introduce that into the EUTHANASIA oppose it with all the media hype that creates such extreme arguments on public opinion.
What, however, I am most irritating thing is that in all this fuss, ignores the daily problems of those who like Eluana are in a state of severe or limited "responsiveness" and that, for them, somehow, you chose to live, even if it costs sacrifice and suffering.
How many states are growing in Italy and particularly in Campania;
how they came to that status;
What is the path to the most appropriate course of treatment;
which the state of research on vegetative states;
What national guidelines;
What are the appropriate structures and how many national and regional
As has been analyzed in various regions, especially in Campania.
are just some of the questions facing the families of brain-damaged and awaiting response from the competent bodies, and on these topics, no news organization has felt the need to open an investigation. Why?

Infinate Money Cheat Emerald

right to life Right to life case Eluana

On the case Englaro's request to publish by the Associations of Relatives of the brain of the Republic of Milan because Prcuratore propose to appeal death sentence for Eluana. This document represents the views dell'Assoociazione and my personal

the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Milan

Dear Attorney General of the Republic of Milan,

Subjects:

Federation National Association Cranial Plot (n. 23 member associations - ( http://www.associazionitraumi.it/ )

joined the network associated head injury and severe brain injury (. ... member associations)
The association
VI.VE. non-profit organization (20 members including medical psychologists, bioethicists)

years been among the most representative associations in Italy dealing with coma and vegetative states and issues related to their outcomes and the severe brain injury, have an internal scientific committees and expert advice including foreigners, following the clinical and training, are therapeutic alliance with excellent facilities and are directly involved in the processes of social change on the issues of "quality of life outcomes in a coma" and the need to "protect civil rights care and dignity of life "in a uniform manner on the national territory and have demonstrated in recent years also to be able to talk constructively and operating with the competent parliamentary, ministerial and institutional usually at the local level.

associations have shown in recent years to be able to play a role in three functions:
- Knowing how to catch a few decades a variety of needs and understand them in their entirety and in their priorities, from a lived experience and know how be proactive.
- Knowing how to gather around these resources needs
- Being able to experiment with innovative models of intervention with a strong collaboration between families and the technical scientific community, an alliance with the medical staff in the planning, design, validate these buildings in the path of solutions that demonstrate the strong ability of families to talk with professionals

ASK THE APPEAL

to submit without delay to appeal to the Court of Appeal on the case Eluana.


CONSIDERED CONTRARY to the concept of irreversibility of the vegetative state
a vegetative state can not be determined with absolute certainty irreversible and permanent. The ruling cites a definition of Multisociety Task Force on Developing Countries of the now largely dated 1994 which refers to the distinction between old-fashioned for too long a permanent vegetative state and persistent. There is mention of a rather large literature subsequent and otherwise. Really sorry that on this point incontrovertibly the ruling of the Court of Appeal of Milan that is (and only too) rebuilt to a dated document of a ministerial commission immediately opposed by the vast majority of the scientific world, to the point that that document has now taken the distances in the same ministry, and about everything when in fact you have another, more recent document of a subsequent ministerial commission, yes officially recognized by the ministry, which reaffirms the current inability of science to make a diagnosis of persistent vegetative state , so that the latter document suggests deleting the definition of "permanent vegetative state" for replace it with the scientifically more correct than "prolonged vegetative state." It must be noted that to date it is not possible to determine whether these people are able to feel pain or suffering. It may be true, however without any form of certainty, for some of the people in a vegetative state, but it is not true for most of them. The evidence of recent years, particularly with the techniques of neuroimaging and cognitive potential, showed a panorama of situations much more complex than what we thought until not long ago. Traces of some type of cognitive processing are present in a number of patients with clinical diagnosis of vegetative state. The evidence is so significant that not only introduced the diagnosis of minimally conscious state, but even some scholars have suggested an intermediate category of "minimally conscious state without any behaviors that clinically mimerebbe a state of vegetation. Although it was a state of minimal consciousness rather than a vegetative state, it is worth remembering the case of Terry Wallis, who has substantially changed since 19 years! Also shown is the high risk of misdiagnosis (over 40% in some series). Finally, in most patients small changes in the profile of environmental responsiveness occurring over the years, a sign of adaptation processes and plasticity that are assets over time. Therefore, a prognosis of vegetative state is a prognosis Irreversible scientific applications. This is rather an outcome of probabilistic nature. It is also important to consider that the person in a vegetative state does not have a flat EEG is not terminally ill, is a person who upon reaching clinical stability is no longer considered to be "patient or malt" but people with serious disabilities, it is perhaps The person with the highest level of disability. And 'person for all purposes to which are ascribed to all the rights of a citizen.

the NIA as a medicine
is not shared in the medical literature, the concept supported by the Supreme Court that the NIA is a drug, therefore rejectable art. The use of 32 of the Constitution safeguards nasogastric tube and / or enteral tube (PEG) for hydration and nutrition, should not be considered a treatment for a person otherwise unable to do so on its behalf. If there is no treatment, there can be so fiercely. And how can we consider that: implanting these garrisons is not at all invasive are used for the purpose for which they were designed (to nourish and hydrate), the administration of food and water can be carried by anyone (family members who do so are at home ) through a simple connection of the container of food or drink in the tube; preparations food technological processes involving chemical (also commonly used) may be replaced by all-natural foods that can be reduced to a proper density by appliance (they are many families who administer natural foods). Lastly, it appears somewhat contradictory in this respect the rules stated in the execution sentence of suspension of NIA at the point where tax is still needed as well as a frequent moistening of the mucous membranes, including the administration of a "substance capable of eliminating the inconvenience of lack of fluids. " That is, the patient must be hydrated.

to authorize the use of "good life"
remain rejected some key principles of our legal system, such as the most personal of acts indelegabilità goods unavailable as the good life, assuming that at present there is no legislation that authorizes the representative to assert in this sense the concern expressed previously by the person under guardianship. So it is really beyond any logic and any legal precedent as well as out of any good or make the normal sense of conviction Eluana clear desire to leave a "living will" in the sense to refuse treatment in the case, then unfortunately occurred, the personal condition of vegetative state, by a character young freedom-loving and with simple phrases such incidents to comment absolutely typical and normal in a young woman as a young man, is really disconcerting and dangerous take from this time a decision of accepting an application for cancellation of a life lovingly carried on for 15 years!

subjects in appeal, in respecting the human story of Eluana and his family, they feel deeply affected by a ruling that calls into question:

- the lives of thousands of people in Italy are in the same conditions, who are cared for by family members living with passion and sharing, with prospects for their future well-being, without any justification the legal, ethical and scientific, also makes it even more precarious and vulnerable, "the existing rights and, in particular, future, thousands of people with a diagnosis of vegetative state and their families;
- if it is held a declaration in young age as a manifestation of will, and then as a form of biological testmento, the very life of thousands of people with severe disabilities or those with different diseases including degenerative brain system.
- the work of associations, social cooperation and the voluntary sector who work with planning and strategies for the quality of life of patients with severe brain injury, results in a state of coma and vegetation for their social reintegration and protection of their social value
- internationally and identified by scientific assessments, which found the basis for a therapeutic course for patients treated



FNATC
National Federation Cranial Trauma Association
The Network (The President - Paul Fogar) Associations together to head trauma and severe brain injury


LIVE onlus (Screw Vegetative)