prepare. Because soon, on a number of important local stations in Lombardy, will spot a pro-euthanasia. Manufactured in Australia where, however, was immediately criticized, was quickly translated and imported from the Italian Radicals, which now will pay the spread. Unless, of course, any guarantor of the stop.
In a video player, impersonating a patient, said he made his "final choice" and calls for the government "plays." Then, the tactic now usual pitiful case = + polls favor the law do we want, just tell us that "67% of Italians are in favor of legalizing euthanasia."
Nothing new under the sun, actually. In the sense that, just as an example, since the times of the law told us that 40 percent of Italians were in favor of the Bulgarian instances radicals. Too bad that, then there was to be implemented when all the figures bandied about have found no correspondence in reality.
All quiet then? Not really. Why the negativity of the spot not be underestimated. We look to the concreteness of the message and what is written (or better said) between the lines: the patient is alone, not attached to any machine with a woman who is always behind him, never speak. What we want to get across is the idea that illness is a matter solely and exclusively for the sick. That - alone - can not decide which it anymore and end his life. This applies to all patients, the ad seems to say, not only for "extreme cases" who live only with the help of special machines. Everyone, at some point, it must be able to decide over. And the state, mere instrument of the will of some, but also to ensure that their supposed right. Which, of course, would mean the "duty" for the state to kill its own citizens.
Ghastly? It's not over here. Why is there a woman who, as mentioned, remains still and silent behind the patient. Away from him because, in fact, according to spot the disease and treatment are lonely things. In this woman still and silent for the message (but not too subliminal) that we would give to the sick whether to legalize euthanasia. "You are a burden - we would call them - both for your loved ones and for society. You are a cost of no more productive, you are useless, it is better if you stand away. You would do yourself a favor, and to others. "
The spiral that would be triggered (and in some countries have already initiated) is tremendous, because it would ultimately weaken the desire of those who wish to fight. That would always be constantly and continually faced with the choice: "I state, I give you the tools to levarti of the way without giving too much trouble. Are you really sure you want to continue to be a burden to your loved ones and an expense for my speakers? ". As always remember
oncology Sylvie Menard and Dr. Mario Melazzini, requests for euthanasia of the sick are always, in fact, required help. And what should I do to respond to the cry of pain of these people, it is not left on their own. The way in which a just society must respond to the weak, in trouble, and seek help and take care of them. In the true sense of the word.
Caring for a sick person does not just mean giving the right drug, to choose the best therapy and park it in the correct department. This, explains Mario Melazzini often, it is only a part. Taking care of the sick person means to see him as a person and not like a walking disease. It means to cheer him when discouraged, to be near him when he is alone, understand their deepest needs and ensure that sees doctor not the mere executor of certain techniques (as would Veronesi), but above all a smiling face and a hand that supports it. Always.
It really does not care is just one thing "by doctors." E ', first and foremost, one thing to men, from "social animals" who will never forget their relationship and be giving a hand to their fellow beings in distress. They ask for euthanasia? And we respond really taking care of each patient. One last detail
strategic, perhaps at odds with the rest of the article but it should say. Let us be careful! Ignazio Marino has already spoken out against the ad because it says that affecting the battle for living wills. Here, here falls ass. They want us to believe (again, like they did with Law 40 and Law 194), precisely to reject the radical demands of euthanasia in the round you have to accept a "compromise." For example, as indeed would like Marino, euthanasia only in certain cases. We are careful not to fall into their trap, because once again to be at stake is people's lives.
0 comments:
Post a Comment