Hiv Test Negative 6 Weeks

Students in revolt. Sledge's vote DDLGelmini

Students, researchers, teachers in revolt against the DDL Gelmini. Pacifici, innovative, clear, certain. We know we had. Emilio Fede as say in its news program, now a newsletter system where the reality is cormai an annoying problem.

already in the field with initiatives from September, strikes and proposals, the University increased efforts to secure the approval of the bill Gelmini originally scheduled today in the House, and now shifted to Tuesday, November 30 while the Government is in disarray sulel its own proposals.

The attack on the university system and government research had never attained such a high level in the context of a deeply unstable country from a political point of view. Italy is among the countries in Europe has invested less in education and research in recent decades. The reform of the Gelmini stabilizes the cuts (more than 1 billion €) and gives no perspective to researchers and students.

What's wrong, what we call>>

DDL Gelmini, what's wrong

• Ri for but at no cost : the government has taken from the university 1 billion and 200 million euro, which should add 200 million more cuts to research, and gave back a portion, just enough to ensure compulsory expenditure of the universities, partly to reduce the shameful attempt to abolish the right to study;
• exponential increase in bureaucracy: 170 rules that will become 500 with the delegations. The universities will be trapped in a rigid framework of the Ministerial which very little remains to be evaluated, you will only get a uniform bureaucratic or circumvention legislation. For example, if the universities can not do the personnel policy, which affects almost the performance of research;
• No new space for researchers indefinitely (those pre-reform) in the following places to become professors, they recognize that without the activities carried out lectures to date, precluding so any hope of a career.
• lock turnover already put in place before (the Finance Act 2009) and lockout seniority with consequent aging of the teaching staff
• Cancellation of right to education;
• uncertainties about the governance of Universities, in particular the CDA. The presence of external members on the boards, it all depends on who appoints them, but they say even in a very prescriptive text. If the appointment is internal it is a tool already in place and has only served to strengthen the power of the rector. If, however, the appointment is outside the danger of falling into the hands of a logic best companies is remarkable.

Our proposals

• Use the Law of stability to fully restore the cuts university and research and to provide open spaces in the selection, based on the merits of a new generation of academics, giving opportunities based on merit, the researchers designed and insecure.
• At least 50% of resources allocated to universities with the evaluation of research and teaching, based on student choices and knowledge acquired over the
• retirement at age 65 teachers. The aim is to introduce a shock generation in Italian universities: ten years we want to lower the average age of teachers. They need to know that you can go in a chair in less than 35 years, when you are able to give their best studies,
• Simplification of rules and freedom organization for universities;
• Transparent criteria for programming and planning agreements between the Ministry and universities
• Contract single ricercator in training, social protection and social security. And stop all the casual relationships and a unique role in teaching the tier.
• Right to Education guaranteed for all.